| ▲ | strgcmc a year ago | |
| Comments in other threads explained why there will always be a gap between generation vs storage capacity, or why it's economically unwise to build so much storage as to cover peak generation. For my purposes, I assumed a reasonable allocation towards storage was already going to happen, and that there would still be excess unused capacity beyond that level. | ||
| ▲ | _aavaa_ a year ago | parent [-] | |
| Maybe, maybe no. But it’d put wasting money on Bitcoin very low on that list. My person idea would be a 1,000ft tesla coil to have it look cool. | ||