| ▲ | delusional 3 months ago |
| That's a legal issue. If humans wanted that content to be up, we just could have agreed to keep it up. Legal issues don't get solved by technology. |
|
| ▲ | jazzyjackson 3 months ago | parent | next [-] |
| Well. The legal complaint was that transcripts don't exist. The issue was that it was prohibitively expensive to resolve the complaint. Now that transcription is 0.1% of the cost it was 8 years ago, maybe the complaint could have been resolved. Is building a ramp to meet ADA requirements not using technology to solve a legal issue? |
| |
| ▲ | delusional 3 months ago | parent [-] | | Nowhere on the linked page at least does it say that it was due to cost. It would seem more likely to me that it was a question of nobody wanting to bother standing up for the videos. If nobody wants to take the fight, the default judgement becomes to take it down. Building a ramp solves a problem. Pointing at a ramp 5 blocks away 7 years later and asking "doesn't this solve this issue" doesn't. | | |
| ▲ | pests 3 months ago | parent [-] | | Yet this feels very harrison bergeron to me. To handicap those with ability so we all can be at the same level. | | |
| ▲ | fuzzy_biscuit 3 months ago | parent [-] | | Right. The judgment doesn't help people with disabilities at all. It only punishes the rest of the population. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | yard2010 3 months ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Yet. Legal issues don't get solved by tech yet! |
