▲ | polishdude20 3 days ago | |||||||
The play devil's advocate, presumably they're fired because they didn't meet standards (in whatever vague way they can justify) and they want foreign workers because local workers didn't meet those standards. | ||||||||
▲ | jdbernard 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Parent's point was about lay-offs, not firings. I'm very comfortable with their suggestion. Make the company be explicit. If it's a firing ("they are underperforming") then sure, that doesn't affect H1B eligibility, but you have to actually fire them. If it is a layoff ("we don't need those jobs") then why are you turning around and hiring for them immediately afterwards? | ||||||||
| ||||||||
▲ | fullwaza 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
If some % of workers were hired that didn't meet standards, then it seems like those doing the hiring are the ones that need to be replaced first. | ||||||||
▲ | wetpaws 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
[dead] |