Seems the article is about discounting the issue simply by redefining the word "friend".

>Seems the article is about discounting the issue simply by redefining the word "friend".

I noticed the same.

>relative, client, neighbor, fellow platoon member, whatever

The author doesnt think clients or neighbours can be friends? That's just straight up doing it wrong.

A platoon member who isnt a friend? is that even possible?