So the gist of the article is this: The C++ committee should take charge of tooling and implement standardized tooling that matches the standards. Okay, but that won't stop the existence of other tooling, including old tooling, and it won't fix the problem of legacy code. So what's the point? Why bother? Plus unsafe memory calls are mainly found in libraries and applications, not the core language. How will standardized tooling fix that or any of the existing problems for that matter?