▲ | deepnet 7 months ago | |||||||
The USA & Russia made a pact to defend the Ukraine, based on the Ukraine giving up their nukes. “ As the United States mediated between Russia and Ukraine, the three countries signed the Trilateral Statement on January 14, 1994. Ukraine committed to full disarmament, including strategic weapons, in exchange for economic support and security assurances from the United States and Russia.” If the USA doesn’t defend them adequately the USA will have broken their 1994 agreement - with all the trust implications for future agreements. By invading the Ukraine, Russia broke its 1994 deal. The USA and Russia also agreed in 1994 to Ukrainian autonomy and sovereignty, e.g. the freedom to join NATO and the EU if they want - which gives the lie to NATO membership as a cause ! Russia agreed in 1994 that the Ukraine had the right to join NATO or anything else it wanted to do - that is the the definition of autonomy and sovereignty. Thus implicitly, in fact, Russia agreed to defend the Ukraine’s right to join NATO. Russia has broken treaties to invade many of it neighbours recently, this needs to be questioned not apologised for. | ||||||||
▲ | mrguyorama 7 months ago | parent [-] | |||||||
More concretely, if Russia is allowed ANY success in Ukraine, it puts the nail in the coffin of nuclear non-proliferation. If the only thing the world does is bow to anyone who can hold it hostage with a nuclear threat, the only defense is your own nukes. If you want to avoid countries fighting nuclear war, you are better off fucking over Russia right now, and understanding that their nuclear talk is all bluff (for now) rather than wait until hundreds of tiny and unstable countries have nukes that they want to fire at each other. If the West defends Ukraine from a nuclear armed nation, then we can convincingly tell the rest of the world "You don't need nukes, so don't build them". | ||||||||
|