| ▲ | niek_pas 2 years ago | |||||||
Not trying to “gotcha” you, but I would imagine that 10x the CPU of ls is still very little, or am I wrong? | ||||||||
| ▲ | jeffbee 2 years ago | parent [-] | |||||||
In the case of the 500k tree, `lla` needs 2.5 seconds, so it's pretty substantial. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | niek_pas 2 years ago | |||||||
Not trying to “gotcha” you, but I would imagine that 10x the CPU of ls is still very little, or am I wrong? | ||||||||
| ▲ | jeffbee 2 years ago | parent [-] | |||||||
In the case of the 500k tree, `lla` needs 2.5 seconds, so it's pretty substantial. | ||||||||
| ||||||||