▲ | bawolff 3 days ago | |||||||||||||
> And also, remember when a researcher says "loneliness" they mean "self-reported loneliness," I know a lot of people with very little companionship who might insist they are a 0 out of 10 on the loneliness scale. That seems reasonable. Lonliness is a subjective phenomenon. There are people who don't interact as much as other people but feel content about it and aren't lonely. There are people who are desperate for interaction and get a lot but who are never satisfied. I can't imagine any other way to measure this than by asking. | ||||||||||||||
▲ | rendaw 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
But there are also people who believe they are fine alone but are negatively affected by it, and people who have lots of friends and interaction but nonetheless lack connection. People aren't very good at judging their own emotions. Not having a better way to measure doesn't mean this measure is sufficient. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
▲ | PrismCrystal 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
"There are people who don't interact as much as other people but feel content about it and aren't lonely." Yet the difficulty about self-reported degrees of loneliness, is that it doesn’t tell you how resilient a person’s contentedness is. Put that person in a crisis situation, like a suddenly precarious financial situation or a serious illness, and they might feel that they desperately crave human contact and were masking it before. |