| ▲ | bowsamic 4 hours ago |
| Then you must be avoiding situations that traditionally use OOP |
|
| ▲ | zozbot234 3 hours ago | parent [-] |
| Most kinds of OOP can be expressed idiomatically in Rust. The big exception is implementation inheritance, which is highly discouraged in modern code anyway due to its complex and unintuitive semantics. (Specifically, its reliance on "open recursion", and the related "fragile base class" problem) |
| |
| ▲ | galangalalgol an hour ago | parent [-] | | People often say that modern c++ doesn't have the problems needing a solution like rust. Ironically that means people who write modern c++ haven't had any aramp up time needed when joining our rust projects. They were already doing things the right way. At least mostly. But now they don't have to worry about that one person who seems to be trying to trick the static analysis tools on purpose. |
|
