Remix.run Logo
afavour 16 hours ago

If the revenue per user is enough to cover costs, does it matter? Will it have to change?

We’ve all had “hockey stick growth!” shouted at us so many times that we’ve internalised it but Bluesky is a team is 20 odd people. They don’t have the kind of footprint Meta has and right now they don’t need it. I hope they stay small and chart a different path to success.

hellcow 15 hours ago | parent [-]

They just raised $15M. Surely their investors expect a large return.

afavour 15 hours ago | parent [-]

They’d be dumb to:

> Bluesky Social is a benefit corporation; as such, it is allowed to use its profits for the public good, and is not obligated to maximize shareholder value or return profits to its shareholders as dividends.

I have no idea but I suspect the investors see monetary value in an open social network not owned and operated by today’s tech giants. There’s a difference between users making money via the social network and the social network making money via the users. But both involve making money.

dhosek 15 hours ago | parent | next [-]

[Public] Benefit Corporations¹ are this weird sort of in-between between a non-profit and a regular corporation. My first encounter with this was the benefit corp that was set up for This American Life and Serial (although the latter is now owned by the New York Times) and after reading a whole bunch, it’s still not entirely clear to me what it means. Everything I’ve seen talks about transitioning from a non-benefit corp to a benefit corp, I don’t know if the concept is old enough for the reverse to have ever happened.

1. Whether it’s called a “benefit corporation” or “public benefit corporation” apparently depends on the state, and not all states have laws to allow them to be established.

ndiddy 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The only protection that the "public benefit corporation" status provides is that investors can't sue the company for failing to maximize shareholder value. There's lots of other avenues they can take to make the company do what they want (assuming sufficient share ownership) such as pressuring the board, voting in directors, or converting the company to a regular corporation (it's not like a 501(c)(3) where this isn't possible in most cases).

llm_trw 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Remember when open ai was a not for profit?

dhosek 14 hours ago | parent [-]

It still is.

jazzyjackson 15 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Yea good point, kind of a commodotize your complement kind of thing , Blockchain Capital needs a new landscape of marks to scam.