Maybe it’s just me, but I fundamentally disagree with the mentality that we should prioritize the “feeling of being special” among those who already get the joke (and corresponding point) at the expense of those who have yet to appreciate the message.

You can still laugh at the joke with the section there, you’ll just have fewer confused people to correct, and be in one less elite club.

The thing is, the last part does not just explain the joke, it is a very angry rant, and it ruins it for me because of the change of tone.

Imagine in real life, someone starts making a joke, and then suddenly starts cursing and yelling. I wouldn't be comfortable with what feels like a lack of self-control and I will try to move away before things get violent.

Either do the "joke" style or the "angry rant" style, not both. The joke can be explained calmly if there is a need to.

Sure, but the point of critical thinking club isn’t really its exclusivity. In this case if you don’t know which specific header this is parodying that’s completely understandable. But if you really think this is about computers stabbing people and can’t laugh at yourself about it when you find out that it isn’t then I don’t think we will be able to engage on this topic in a mutually rewarding manner.