| ▲ | n2d4 14 hours ago |
| > Is this necessary to correctly represent human language? Yes! As soon as you have any invisible characters (eg. RTL or LTR marks, which are required to represent human language), you will be able to encode any data you want. |
|
| ▲ | wruza 8 hours ago | parent [-] |
| How many direction marks can we see in this hidden text? |
| |
| ▲ | n2d4 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | None — it's tag characters instead, which are used to represent emojis. But there's no difference! Either you can smuggle text in Unicode, or you can't. It's quite binary, and you don't gain advantages from having "fewer ways" to smuggle text, but you certainly gain advantages from having emojis in your characterset. |
|
