| ▲ | diath 14 hours ago |
| The worst part is when you want to bring along people that are not as much of a wizard as you are. I've been prototyping some multiplayer, online video game with MMO-like sharding for a while now, mostly the backend and core stuff for the project and wanted to get two of my friends on the project to develop the gameplay logic which is largely done through a dynamic scripting language, but some features (that, say, I did not foresee needed yet), require source changes to expose the APIs to the scripting language, now, these guys are capable of doing these changes but the onboarding process for a single potential co-developer is such a pain, I basically have to explain to them how to download a compiler, a package manager like vcpkg (which wasn't even that much usable for these types of things pre-versioning, and is still not working properly - i.e. trying to pin LuaJIT version to 2.0.5 for VM bytecode compatibility will attempt to build LuaJIT with cl.exe on Linux), a build system like CMake, and so on, then guide them through all the steps to get the compiler, the build system, and the libraries working, and then hope that in the end they will actually work and not force you to spend an entire day over a remote desktop software trying to get them to become productive. |
|
| ▲ | tom_ 13 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Include more of your dependencies in the repo and build them aa part of the ordinary build process. Now a package manager does not need to get involved. |
| |
| ▲ | diath 13 hours ago | parent [-] | | Manually copy-pasting source trees around sounds like such an outdated idea from decades ago on how to approach dependency management in a modern programming language. Not to mention that you then have to hook them up to the build system that you are using and not all of them will work out of the box with the one you are using for your project, sure, if you are using CMake and your dependency uses CMake, you can add a subproject, how do you deal with it when they're mixed-and-matched aside from rewriting the builds for every dependency you're pulling in; or without manually writing glue shell scripts to build them independently and put them into a directory? How do you then ensure the said shell script works across different platforms? There are way too many issues with that approach that are solved in other languages through a standardized project management tool. | | |
| ▲ | a_t48 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | You don't have to actually copypaste. You can use CMake and FetchContent/CPM. You can specify custom build commands or inline declare a project for anything small that you pull in that doesn't use CMake (you can call add_library with a glob on the folder FetchContent pulled in, for example - I've done so here https://github.com/basis-robotics/basis/blob/main/cpp/CMakeL... for a header only lib). For large external dependencies that are either very slow to compile or for some reason aren't CMake, reach for the system package manager or similar. If you want to be really cross platform and are supporting Qt/wxwidgets/etc, vcpkg+CMake+clang is solid combo, if a bit slow and a bit disk space heavy with the build cache. | |
| ▲ | lenkite 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Have you taken a look at CPM ? https://github.com/cpm-cmake/CPM.cmake . It makes CMake project management easy - no need for separate package manager tool. | |
| ▲ | mgaunard 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | And yet that's the right approach. It's not really copying but rather onboarding. You don't want to depend on a third-party hosting the code, so you need to copy it, and pin it to a specific version. You might also need to patch it since you'll be using it and most likely will run into problems with it. Using third-party code means taking ownership of all the problems one might encounter when trying to use it in your project, so you might as well just adapt it for it to work with your tools and processes. If you use a modular system this is essentially just maintaining a fork. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | cyclopeanutopia 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Can't you just put that into a docker container? |
| |
| ▲ | diath 13 hours ago | parent [-] | | This is more of a workaround than a solution; see my other comment in this thread. |
|