But why say so under a pseudonym and avoid clarifying what products the process is for? Even if open source and not productized surely the interest goes simply beyond the the US presidents executive order regarding memory safety.

I don't disagree with the implication that order relies on oversimplification and misunderstanding of the ask but surely it and Rust do not mean as a theme C++ standards must not take anything from it no?

Please don't shame people for using pseudonyms on here, regardless of whether you disagree with their concrete point. It's nice to have a place where people don't have to think about how their friends, family or colleagues will react before posting something.

> But why say so under a pseudonym

That's a rather odd complaint, coming from a pseudonym.