Remix clone Hacker News

First you need to identify a victim before you can come to their rescue. Is the parent poster a victim? Are the people he taunts into death threats his victims? Am I a victim of your verbal attack. Are you a victim because you read something and reacted?

▲

mulmen 17 hours ago | parent [-]

You don’t know what the parent posted. I didn’t attack you.

You shared your own irrelevant experience which undermines the experience of being threatened. You then used that irrelevant experience to assume with no information that these threats were deserved.

You could have instead asked what was posted and then offered your advice if it was warranted. But what post or posts justify graphic death threats?

▲

ipaddr 17 hours ago | parent [-]

If I felt you attack me doesn't that make me a victim based on your worldview. You tell me that my opinion is irrelevant because someone who you labelled a victim could be undermined then you do the same thing.

You can't have it both ways. You can be a hero saving a victim by creating more victims.

What posts justify graphic death threats? In a vacuum none. With context I could think of many examples including: Maybe he is posting death threats himself or perhaps committed a crime to a person in an identity we consider more of a victim.

Someone who punches somebody and when they hit them back that person is suddenly the victim? I'm not sure I see the world as black and white as that.

	▲	mulmen 17 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> If I felt you attack me doesn't that make me a victim based on your worldview. No. > You tell me that my opinion is irrelevant because someone who you labelled a victim could be undermined then you do the same thing. I didn’t say your opinion is irrelevant. I said your experience of not receiving death threats is irrelevant to someone else’s experience of receiving death threats. > You can't have it both ways. You can be a hero saving a victim by creating more victims. I’m not a hero and I’m not saving anyone. > Maybe he is posting death threats himself or perhaps committed a crime to a person in an identity we consider more of a victim. There’s literally no justification for graphic death threats. You have no reason to believe either of those hypotheticals are real. > Someone who punches somebody and when they hit them back that person is suddenly the victim? I'm not sure I see the world as black and white as that. You are arguing with your own straw man.