▲ | icelancer 16 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
No RBAC is sad, though understandable. Wireguard is so much faster than OpenVPN. We use Wireguard for S2S but unfortunately need OpenVPN for our employees and contractors due to RBAC. All posts and writeups we've found trying to shoehorn RBAC into Wireguard ultimately ends up with people saying "don't do this." | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | tptacek 11 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
The point of the WireGuard design is to be agnostic to "upper-layer" concerns like this; it's a fast (optionally) kernel-resident secure transport that you can build whatever you'd like on top of. WireGuard isn't about RBAC and doesn't have a "don't do RBAC" position. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
▲ | srockets 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
There’s a very good implementation of Wireguard with RBAC. It’s called Tailscale. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
▲ | gonzo 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Kernel wirguard may be (and often is) faster than OpenVPN without DCO, but OpenVPN with DCO is oftent substantially faster than kernel WireGuard. DCO is available for Linux, FreeBSD and Windows. | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | ahalimah 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I like Defguard for this https://defguard.net/ | |||||||||||||||||
|