Unless you are implying having no security at airports whatsoever (which will never happen), abolishing TSA simply means replacing one central agency with hundreds/thousands of private security agencies and companies in every state and city, which will only increase costs.

You should let SFO and the handful of other airports with private security know they can decrease costs by switching to TSA.

Except, quoting https://www.marketplace.org/2016/08/11/pros-and-cons-privati...

> Contractors provide a more flexible workforce for his airport, and on top of that, it’s easier to show people the door, he said.

> “If employees are not performing, they can be dealt with appropriately, better or more effectively on a contract side than a government side,” Sprenger said.

> Labor unions say the real reason airports want to go with contractors is simple: to cut costs. James Mudrock is the president of AFGE Local 1230, the union representing TSA workers in Sacramento, California.