| ▲ | cosmotic a day ago | |||||||
Yes, the articles are scientific. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S01698... https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0144929041000166... https://jov.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2121593 Though this lacks citations and evidence, it's by a generally accepted expert and authority in the field: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/low-contrast/ I'm really struggling to understand the connections you're drawing to food. | ||||||||
| ▲ | ninetyninenine 17 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
It’s ok if you’re struggling. As long as you are humble enough to admit it. The food pyramid is based off of cherry picked data and biased experiments influenced the food industry. This is similar to your cherry picked data. Your data measures low contrast vs high contrast but really you need to measure high contrast vs. blurred background. | ||||||||
| ||||||||