| |
| ▲ | ryandrake 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Karl Rove's "Reality based community[1]" is still with us: > The aide said that guys like me were 'in what we call the reality-based community,' which he defined as people who 'believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality.' [...] 'That's not the way the world really works anymore,' he continued. 'We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors...and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do'. 1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality-based_community | |
| ▲ | cogman10 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | What was nuts in the bush era was the bloodthirstiness both generally and in the media. There's were so few voices that were against invading Iraq. It was just this vagueness that terrorists were everywhere and somehow Iraq was involved in 9/11. (And getting ready to nuke everything). I mean, ffs, there was a popular TV show that spent each season detailing how the brave heros would stop the Muslim terrorists using torture (24). Where I lived, it wasn't uncommon to hear people advocate leveling the middle east with nuclear weapons. | | |
| ▲ | 0xbadcafebee 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | | "Everyone else is an extremist, but I'm totally sane and justified." When you look at "Muslim Extremists" around the world, they are inspired by the same kind of events and influences that "Christian Americans" are. Zealot leaders lying to the people to further their own aims, and the people lapping it up because they see "evidence" of oppression from "the outsiders", are indoctrinated to hate "the outsiders", and have their own problems which they're easily led to blame "the outsiders" for. A minority of people fall for it, but enough to make a lot of noise, and it's just enough that the state can seize it as a "mandate from the people" to justify its actions, and everyone else just shrugs and lets it happen. | | |
| ▲ | aprilthird2021 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Muslim extremists around the world are far more driven by political and land conflicts than anything else. They are far more similar to the IRA than to any Christian extremists. ISIS is the one which seems most ideology driven. But Hamas, Hezbollah, the Taliban, the PLF, the ETLO, the various Kashmiri militants, all of these are largely a result of land conflicts, like the IRA | |
| ▲ | cogman10 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Heh, funnily, I know I wasn't sane. I bought the "weapons of mass destruction" and "pre-emptive strike" lines and the notion of not letting the terrorists win. What happened, I think, is much more banal. Everyone was pissed at such a large successful terrorist attack. Politicians took that as a strong signal that they must do something. And the easiest solutions were new policing agencies, privacy invasion, and invading sovereign nations. Those were easy answers to sell to angry citizens. They were also the wrong answers that lead to hundreds of thousands dead, the region destabilized, new larger terrorist organizations (ISIS/ISIL) and trillions of dollars wasted. The right answer just wasn't flashy. Locking cockpits, diplomacy with Afghanistan leaders, and ultimately intelligence gathering and a targeted strike on Osama bin ladin if he was found. We Americans wanted blood, what we needed was to address the holes that made the attack possible and to just move on. | | |
| ▲ | aprilthird2021 3 days ago | parent [-] | | And unfortunately some countries today are not learning the right lessons from our failures |
|
| |
| ▲ | aprilthird2021 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Yes, Moore was extremely hated in America for the film, but his closing quote has essentially defined the modern day America's isolationist movement: "The people who have the least, who suffer the most, are always the first to stand up to defend that very system. And all they ask us in return is that we never send them in harms way unless it's absolutely necessary. Now, they may never trust us again." |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | wrs 3 days ago | parent [-] | | Also, if you can get people to connect intensely with just one or two of your statements, you can then make other false statements and they won’t care, because that might invalidate the one they really want to believe. The threshold is so low that the shotgun approach of just telling lies continually actually works quite well. Your statements don’t even have to be consistent, so you can A/B test the lies. The normal backpressure to this is that you lose face with your peers because you become known as a liar. But if your peers don’t influence your success, or you just have no peers, it works. | | |
|
