▲ | wbl a day ago | |||||||
France has 80% zero carbon all the time. Why not resistive heating? | ||||||||
▲ | fsh a day ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
According to the IEA [1], 43% of the energy consumption is oil (transportation, heating), 18% is natural gas (mostly heating), and 25% is electricity. Switching to resistive heating would require doubling the electricity production. Using heat pumps is much more efficient. | ||||||||
▲ | UltraSane a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Heat pumps reduce electricity usage by at least 3x and also provide cooling. | ||||||||
▲ | pfdietz a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
It's expensive compared to heat pumps, especially if you also want air conditioning. | ||||||||
▲ | Scoundreller a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
They lose out on export revenue | ||||||||
▲ | mschuster91 20 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
> Why not resistive heating? Because France has a massive dependency on nuclear power... of course resistive heaters are cheaper than anything else when you got a ton of NPPs around. But their plants are all aging and are a nightmare to keep operational, so if they'd switch over to heat pumps their total energy demand would go down drastically. | ||||||||
|