The point isn't to compare random AI art with random human art. The overarching sentiment lately has been that AI art feels bad and has this "Fake" quality to it.

This survey is refuting that argument. AI art can be used in media just like human art and people can't really tell (or care if they can't tell the difference).

> This survey is refuting that argument. AI art can be used in media just like human art and people can't really tell (or care if they can't tell the difference).

Sure, as long as the AI art - and the human art it might be presented with - is presented without context and in low resolution.