| ▲ | Sharlin a year ago |
| Other alternatives: pixels, minifb, softbuffer. |
|
| ▲ | colleagueRiley a year ago | parent [-] |
| Sure, but none of these are true alternatives because they are missing a lot of features that libraries like GLFW or RGFW have. (They may be good alternatives for certain use-cases) |
| |
| ▲ | Sharlin a year ago | parent [-] | | Oh, just based on the README I assumed RGFW was more minimal than it actually is. | | |
| ▲ | colleagueRiley a year ago | parent [-] | | Minimal refers to the code itself. GLFW's codebase is ~10MB while RGFW's is about ~300kb. But RGFW tries to support nearly everything that GLFW supports. | | |
|
|
