▲ | cocoto 3 days ago | |
It is specified previously in the text that support for references would be nice for optionals. | ||
▲ | tialaramex 3 days ago | parent [-] | |
And unless I'm mistaken C++ 26 gets std::optional<T&> with the preferred representation (ie it's the same size as T& like with Rust's Option<&T> and &T pairing) and the ergonomics are no worse than you'd expect for C++ |