▲ | lasermike026 3 days ago | |||||||||||||
Does anyone know how they are going to make money and turn a profit one day? | ||||||||||||||
▲ | km144 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
Same as the big tech companies, probably make all of their products worse in service to advertising. AI-generated advertising prompted by personal data could be extremely good at getting people to buy things if tuned appropriately. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
▲ | uptownfunk 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
Cost of inference will tend to the the same as cost of a Google search. It is infra that will come down to negligible and almost free. Then as others have said it will tend to freemium (pay to have no ads). And additional value added services as they continue to evolve up the food chain (ai powered sales, marketing, etc) | ||||||||||||||
▲ | thornewolf 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
LLM inference is getting cheaper year over year. It often loses money now, it may eventually stop losing money when it gets cheap enough to run. - But surely the race to the bottom will continue? Maybe, but they do offer a consumer subscription that can diverge from actual serving costs. /speculation | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
▲ | sigmar 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
relatedly: is claude3.5-haiku being delivered above their cost, after they quadrupled the price? Though it wouldn't ensure profitability since they're spending so much on training. I'm sure with inference-use growing, they're hoping that eventually total_expenses(inference) grows to be much much larger than total_expenses(training) | ||||||||||||||
▲ | staticman2 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
<Sarcasm> They'll invent AGI, put 50% of workers out of a job, then presumably have the AGI build some really good robots to protect them from the ensuing riots. </sarcasm> | ||||||||||||||
▲ | danny_codes 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
That's the neat part |