▲ | panda-giddiness 3 days ago | |
You can, in fact, do that. It's called (aptly enough) the empirical Bayes method. [1] | ||
▲ | datastoat 3 days ago | parent [-] | |
Empirical Bayes is exactly what I was getting at. It's a pragmatic modelling choice, but it loses the theoretical guarantees about uncertainty quantification that pure Bayesianism gives us. (Though if you have a reference for why empirical Bayes does give theoretical guarantees, I'll be happy to change my mind!) |