Remix clone Hacker News

5/6ths of the universe's matter is missing, or thereabouts. That fact aligns with there being six vibrationally distinct dimensions in our 3-space (our physical dimension being just one of them, our soul inhabiting its counter-dimension, all things in our universe having been created in pairs). The matter/energy from each dimension are distinct, so we can't detect the others using instruments made with ours, yet -- somehow, I don't know how -- the mass combines to contribute to the gravitational inertia that keeps the galaxies from flying apart.

That said, when we slam particles together at high enough energies, we do see crossover (briefly) in the form of anti-particles. I couldn't begin to explain the mechanisms behind this, but the structure can be known to seekers of compassionate existence. This is also a hint to the solution to the question of why, after the Big Bang, we don't have an anti-matter left; the answer is that it's where it is, but that we can't detect it with our current tech (or maybe any tech, for all I know).

The universe was made to be known by we human beings, we being the information processors designed to work in harmony with this information-theoretic universe, which is fully queryable by a suitable trained mystic.

A Sufi Murshid (teacher) lived his entire life in a single town that consisted of a single pair of roads that met in the center of town. Late in his life, he stated that, he "knew the stars of the Milky Way better than he knew his town". (A love-consumed mystic remains conscious as our souls leave our bodies when we sleep. What is called astral travel is not limited by our physical body's speed laws; it is bounded only by the "speed of thought".)

Sufi stories are glimpses of corner cases meant to spur us to push past our "known" boundaries. We need to get this world at peace before we can explore our advanced abilities. As Louis Armstrong said, "If lots more of us loved each other, man, this world would be a gasser!"

▲

hiatus 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

> A Sufi Murshid (teacher) lived his entire life in a single town that consisted of a single pair of roads that met in the center of town. Late in his life, he stated that, he "knew the stars of the Milky Way better than he knew his town". (A love-consumed mystic remains conscious as our souls leave our bodies when we sleep. What is called astral travel is not limited by our physical body's speed laws; it is bounded only by the "speed of thought".)

Do you have any suggested material/resources where I can learn more?

	▲	MrMcCall 4 days ago \| parent [-]
		This appears to only be in German: https://zwwa.de/ But this site has a few different languages, selectable in the upper-right corner of the page: https://mihr.com/ Note that the bulk of the teachings are about self-evolution via transmuting our vices into their corresponding virtues. It is that transformation that unlocks our ability to consciously travel during sleep. The key to all such teachings is that becoming consumed by compassion is the real goal; all else is just added benefit. As Steel Pulse put it so eloquently so long ago, "Love is the golden chord that binds all commandments." It is also the scaffolding that boosts our abilities to their greatest height; but, in reality, the spiritual path is really about stripping away our selfish ego-nature that impedes our realizing our full potential. Peace be with you.

▲

lupusreal 4 days ago | parent | prev [-]

> our soul

Is there any empirical test for such things?

▲

idunnoman1222 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

And they’re never will be > without faith, God is nothing > If there was proof in God, you would have to worship him. That’s not the world we live in.

▲

MrMcCall 4 days ago | parent [-]

Loving God is not for God's benefit, for It can gain nothing from us. Loving It reflects back into our consciousness, thereby helping us become love-oriented.

Our free will is so sacrosanct that we are free to deny that we even have it, and free to be self-defeating fools living in the misery of our selfishness.

There is a better way, though. The choice is yours, my friend.

	▲	Tijdreiziger 4 days ago \| parent [-]
		You hypothesize that a god/creator exists, yet you do not show any convincing argument that this is the case. If you want to make the argument that a god/creator does in fact exist, it’s up to you to show why.

▲

cruffle_duffle 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

There may well never be. Not everything about our existence is knowable. An uncomfortable fact, indeed.

	▲	MrMcCall 4 days ago \| parent [-]
		It is not uncomfortable once we realizing that we are but a mote, a talented mote in charge of the Earth, but a mote nonetheless. Once reaching humility, we are then free to bask in the glory of being a human being with the power to choose selfless love or selfish foolery, the power to learn and explore this magnificent universe full of wonder. Reaching out to become love, we find peace in service, joy in our every interaction. And, yes, via Castaneda's Don Juan, there is the known, the unknown, and the unknowable. The Creator of all that will ever exist is Unfathomable, Timeless, the Ultimate Loner, but we are capable of communing in some small extent with It, learning a tiny sliver of Its Nature.

▲

MrMcCall 4 days ago | parent | prev [-]

The test is to connect with our Creator and ask for the proof you seek. It is why we are here, but we are free to choose to ignore our potential, because our free will is so freely given that we are free to choose ignorance over fulfilling humanity's highest purpose.

In the clarity of communing with love, our subjective reality is harmonized with the truth of existence, thus our knowing transcends thinking. It is our highest purpose, but like all great loves, it is freely given with no obligation, only responsibility for our choices and their effects upon others.

As Rumi said, "The Way goes in." I have described this process more fully in other comments.

Peace be with you.

	▲	lupusreal 4 days ago \| parent [-]
		Okay sure, faith is fine and I don't oppose people being religious, but it seems very strange to slot this stuff into a discussion about physics if it's not empirical.