▲ | suddenlybananas 3 days ago | |||||||
If I have a calculator with a look-up table of all additions of natural numbers under 100, the calculator can "appear" to be adding despite the fact it is not. | ||||||||
▲ | sourcepluck 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Yes, indeed. Bullets know how to fly, and my kettle somehow knows that water boils at 373.15K! There's been an explosion of intelligence since the LLMs came about :D | ||||||||
| ||||||||
▲ | int_19h 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
This argument would hold up if LMs were large enough to hold a look-up table of all possible valid inputs that they can correctly respond to. They're not. | ||||||||
▲ | og_kalu 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Until you ask it to add number above 100 and it falls apart. That is the point here. You found a distinction. If you can't find one then you're arguing semantics. People who say LLMs can't reason are yet to find a distinction that doesn't also disqualify a bunch of humans. |