| ▲ | Macha 4 days ago | |
> nobody has ever taken the time to write an RFC with supporting arguments. https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3243-packages-as-optional-n... | ||
| ▲ | littlestymaar 4 days ago | parent [-] | |
Exactly, this isn't about “default namespace”, this is the other feature which I said had support (didn't know the RFC had been merged though, thanks for pointing that out). This isn't the kind of namespace people say they want to prevent squatting. | ||