|
| ▲ | mdp2021 3 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| It's totally different: those formalisms are in a workbench, following a set of rules that either work or not. So, yes, that (math) is representative of the actual process: pattern recognition gives you spontaneous ideas, that you assess for truthfulness in conscious acts of verification. |
|
| ▲ | sinuhe69 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| What is a casual thought that you cannot explain in math? |
| |
| ▲ | TeMPOraL 3 days ago | parent [-] | | That question makes no sense. You can explain anything in math, because math is a language and lets you define whatever terms and axioms you need at a given moment. (Whether or not such explanation is useful for anything is another issue entirely.) | | |
| ▲ | worldsayshi 3 days ago | parent [-] | | Can you explain how intuition led you to try a certain approach? | | |
| ▲ | TeMPOraL 3 days ago | parent [-] | | Is it enough if I hand-wave it with probability distributions, or do you want me to write out adjacency search in a high-dimensional space? |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | legel 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Math comes from brains. |
