| ▲ | xixixao 5 days ago |
| Screenshots are harder to produce, maintain and publish. I also suspect many technical authors are less “visual” so to speak, putting less emphasis on visual presentation. |
|
| ▲ | steve1977 5 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| Not the best thing for a desktop application framework maybe. |
|
| ▲ | jamager 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > Screenshots are harder to produce, maintain and publish What, really? What am I missing? If you tell me video, yes, but a screenshot... |
| |
| ▲ | madeofpalk 5 days ago | parent [-] | | I don't think it's that hard, but it's easier for screenshots to drift and become out of date compared to just written text documentation. | | |
| ▲ | conductr 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | You’re just trying to give us the gist of things with images. It’s basically selling your thing to me as something I would want to try out. Usually if I connect with something I see in first few moments then my likelihood of trying the thing out is higher. We don’t need it to be updated on every commit. Or illustrated docs but some idea of what I’m getting myself into is nice to have. | |
| ▲ | high_na_euv 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | It is literally a few minutes of effort If you cant do such basic thing, which would significantly improve an ability to understand your product, then wtf |
|
|
|
| ▲ | stiltzkin 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| [dead] |
