| ▲ | dylan604 5 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
And a bullet costs $0.0001, so it's off just as much in the other direction. Also, your focus on cost was not the point. The point was numbers necessary. You need $lots of bullets, but you don't need any where near the same number of jets/tanks. You don't need $lots of satellites. You need a much smaller number closer to the number of jets/tanks. At least based on Starlink constellation numbers. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | thfuran 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I assume you can get some significant bulk discounts at DoD scale, but it's probably still more like $0.10 than $0.0001, which is admittedly still rather less than $1M | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | nradov 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I think you might be getting a little confused by terminology. In military terms a round of ammunition doesn't necessarily describe just a small arms cartridge. It can be any munition that's stored for a long period until needed with minimal maintenance. So even an expensive missile or satellite might be treated as a round of ammunition, depending on the design and concept of operations. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||