Remix.run Logo
Remix clone Hacker News
new | show | ask | jobsGithub
▲ yett 6 days ago

Yeah and this time they won't let them get away. According to Finnish Minister of Defence: "The authorities in the Baltic Sea region have learned from the mistakes of the Baltic Connector investigation and are prepared, if necessary, to stop a ship in the Baltic Sea if it is suspected of being involved in damaging communications cables."[1]

And it looks like according to marinetraffic.com that the Yi Peng 3 is indeed at full stop surrounded by at least 3 Danish navy vessels.

1. article in Finnish https://www.hs.fi/politiikka/art-2000010845324.html

▲dingdingdang 6 days ago | parent | next [-]

Boarded according to: https://x.com/visegrad24/status/1859132263746744367

▲lukan 6 days ago | parent | next [-]

Not confirmed by any mainstream newspaper. The danish forces only confirm, that they are there, but nothing more.

▲usr1106 5 days ago | parent [-]

20 hours later they are cited that they cannot board without China's approval. Legally uncharted grounds whether they could or could not. Looks they take the cautious side for the time being.

▲bananapub 6 days ago | parent | prev [-]

worth noting that twitter account is not the most trustworthy or independent.

▲hersko 6 days ago | parent [-]

What have they posted that was wrong?

▲ceejayoz 6 days ago | parent | next [-]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visegr%C3%A1d_24#Content details a number of cases.

▲mistermann 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

It would be useful to have a site that logs all plausible issues of this kind, at arm's length from Wikipedia editors.

Kind of a "Who watches the watchers?" type of thing.

▲LikesPwsh 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

If that list became popular it would be weaponised by military intelligence.

▲squigz 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Why would that not be prone to the same issue you think Wikipedia faces?

▲zelphirkalt 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

Maybe it would not, but putting all your eggs in one basket has never been a good idea either.

▲squigz 5 days ago | parent [-]

I don't think that's what we're doing, considering Wikipedia points to other 'baskets' as sources.

▲mistermann 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Superior methodology (transcending numerous cultural / psychological / cognitive norms and obligations) is how I would go about it.

For example: banning the conflation of opinion and fact, like what's going on (and always goes on) in this thread, a behavior that is protected (doing otherwise "is not what this site is for").

If an imperfection is noted: log it, investigate, improve. Rinse, repeat.

Also: best prepare one's will, life insurance, etc before undertaking such a project.

▲wslh 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

▲ 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]
[deleted]
▲ 6 days ago | parent | prev [-]
[deleted]