| ▲ | strangecasts 6 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
No, she met with Hunter before it was published: > A followup email from Hunter indicates that he met with Cass on September 22, 2022 (ECF 184-1). Even as Paul Vazquez wanted to invite Cass to the Board of Medicine hearing as a subject matter expert, Hunter felt that would put her “in a difficult position”: Why downplay this link in a discussion about the politicization of science? | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Manuel_D 6 days ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
The interim report - which had the same findings that gender affirming care in minors had scant evidence - was published in March 2022. Also, that quote is not appearing anywhere in the linked article. Did you post the wrong link? Again, is the mere fact that Cass - whose job is to advise governments on healthcare - met with someone in government supposed to disqualify the review as politically motivated? What, specifically, did this DeSantis staffer change in the Cass Review? This is just straightforward attempts at guilt by association. Given that Cass' job is to advise government on healthcare, meeting with government staffers is hardly surprising. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||