> you mean the sea ice, that had the highest extent in 20 years this year?

Your link says it's "the seventh highest recorded since 2006 when this metric from IMS was first tracked consistently". Where are you getting "highest extent in 20 years"?

▲

genewitch 7 months ago | parent [-]

[flagged]

▲

smolder 7 months ago | parent [-]

You're looking at data for confirmation of your bias. Sea Ice volume has been pretty steadily decreasing even as the coverage can increase.

https://www.polarportal.dk/en/sea-ice-and-icebergs/sea-ice-t...

All I can conclude from your posts in this thread is that you are in an unfortunate bubble, are desperately trying not to see reality, or simply want others to doubt it for whatever reason.

▲

genewitch 7 months ago | parent [-]

ok https://www.polarportal.dk/fileadmin/polarportal/sea/SICE_cu...

▲

Delk 7 months ago | parent [-]

That seems to show all of last six years as being in the lowest quartile of measurements from 1981 to 2010.

Or is there something else I'm supposed to be seeing?

	▲	ok_computer 7 months ago \| parent [-]
		I am so confused how their corroborating charts indicate that sea ice is receding, yet they interpret it as a reversal and proof that warming / climate change is a myth.