Remix clone Hacker News

new | show | ask | jobs Github

▲

thrw42A8N 6 days ago

If you used pure Node.js, you wouldn't have any problems whatsoever, too.

▲

neonsunset 6 days ago | parent [-]

Unlike Node projects, your dependencies don't break - they stay on nuget.org, and the projects compile just like they did when they were first implemented. Upgrading dependencies and project target is subject to the same restrictions as in other good languages.

I know for sure that I can clone a random project on Github, hit `dotnet build` and usually expect it to work on the first try. The rate of bitrot for average unmaintained JS project cannot be compared. The average dependency graph of a .NET project is going to be 10 times smaller too.

	▲	MrJohz 6 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		This is true for NodeJS as well - dependencies on NPM cannot be removed, so at long as NPM keeps running, and as long as you've got a lockfile that precisely specifies all dependencies, you shouldn't run into problems running older projects. (Certainly I have never had an issue with this - the problems, if they occur, are always around upgrading. And like you say, this is subject to much the same issues in every ecosystem). If this isn't enough, there are tools like Yarn which encourage vendoring dependencies to ensure that as long as you have a copy of the repository, the yarn CLI, and a valid version of NodeJS, you can always run the project.
	▲	thrw42A8N 6 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Yeah, that's nice, unfortunately it's the built-in Microsoft stuff like WPF that keeps breaking between versions.