Remix clone Hacker News

So the articles themselves have no opinions? They don't make conclusions and use carefully chosen words to sway the reader?

▲

Supermancho 7 days ago | parent [-]

Other than to simplify the concepts for a subjectively "inclined" reader, no. Language is not mathematics. There is no perfection in the area of communication. This is not an insightful observation.

Scientific America aimed to be informative and useful in context of that information, when I was a reader (80s).

	▲	23B1 7 days ago \| parent [-]
		> There is no perfection in the area of communication. Bull puckey. I can be precise in my estimate, and contextual in my language. "We believe x to be generally true because of y chance of likelihood" while not precise in conclusion, it is precise in its intent, which is to communicate a degree of certainty and to convey integrity of thought. This is commonsense science writing that even the plebs can understand.