| ▲ | tzs 7 days ago | |
> Remember Scientific American already endorsed Biden last election which was a wtf moment. In his first term the Trump administration tried to massively cut scientific and medical research, tried to change the rules for the board of outside scientists that review EPA decisions for scientific soundness to not allow academic scientists so that it would only consist of scientists working for the industries that the EPA regulates, tried to make it so that most peer reviewed medical research that showed products causing health problems could not be considered by the EPA when deciding if a chemical should be banned, tried to massively increase taxes on graduate students in STEM fields, wanted to stop NASA from doing Earth science, and let's not forget repeatedly claiming climate change is a hoax. I'm sure I'm forgetting several more. I don't expect my technical publications to have an opinion on things politicians do that have nothing to do with the fields they cover, but when politicians start doing things directly concerning those fields I don't see how it is a WTF moment for them to comment. | ||
| ▲ | ourmandave 7 days ago | parent [-] | |
I'm sure I'm forgetting several more. Like putting a climate science denier in charge of NOAA as he was reluctantly heading out the door. https://www.npr.org/2020/09/12/912301325/longtime-climate-sc... So he could publish a piece under the official NOAA logo to try and gain legitimacy. Looking at all the latest insane picks, can't wait to see what toon he install this go around. | ||