▲ | marcus_holmes 7 days ago | |||||||
"Science advances one funeral at a time" [0] The Scientific Principle (hypothesis -> experiment -> conclusion and all that) does not pay any heed to authority and received wisdom. And it should not; the experiment results are all that matter. Academia, the set of very human organisations that have grown to manage our implementation of the Scientfic Principle, are a long way from perfect and are heavily influenced by authority and received wisdom. So yeah, I don't think it's the essence of science, but distrusting authority and received wisdom definitely required to practice good science. [0] https://www.chemistryworld.com/news/science-really-does-adva... | ||||||||
▲ | yks 7 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||
One funeral at a time is true but “standing on the shoulders of giants” is also true and there is absolutely good science done without redoing all experiments since Newton, like there is a bad science standing on the sand hill of the other bad science. Having distrust by itself will not make one a good scientist and so it can’t be “the essence of science”. | ||||||||
|