| ▲ | itishappy 7 days ago | |
Any examples? I'm in the same boat as you, and while I agree with the premise, I don't recall anything as egregious as the examples from the article: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/denial-of-evoluti... https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-the-term-jedi... | ||
| ▲ | bashmelek 7 days ago | parent | next [-] | |
From my own impression back then, it was less political but more subtly ideological. Truth be told, I have my own ideology as well. Some things that I remember were an article that used a trolley problem of throwing someone in the way to save five as the “obvious rational” choice; and how the covers would often try to link entanglement or dark matter to consciousness. It was numerous little things like that. | ||
| ▲ | setgree 7 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Bias might emerge as much in choice of topics to cover as in the tone of the coverage. On X, someone mentioned that Wired’s coverage in the past 5-10 years is striking for how little it discusses SpaceX, for example. | ||