▲ | iwontberude 9 days ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Having lived in the Midwest, Texas and Bay Area I can soundly say there is no comparison which can be made about the natural splendor. Bay Area, even with smoke in the air for a week, is orders of magnitude more comfortable and interesting. In Texas people cloister into giant houses and say goodbye to enjoying nature, it’s really sad that people prefer such a reality. It lets them forget just how grand a world there is worth saving and fighting for instead of letting it all become privatized and exploited unsustainably. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | kentonv 9 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
I do a lot of biking, and TBH I've had an easier time finding enjoyable bike routes near my house in Austin than I did in Palo Alto. During the summer I go biking at dawn and it's great, and during the winter there are usually 70-degree days regularly enough. Of course, on that measure, Minneapolis blows both of them out of the water -- at least during the half of the year when biking is enjoyable. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | WD-42 9 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
I’ve made this same observation which might explain why there is such a divergent world view between people living in different parts of the country. A neighbor of mine recently moved (back to) Texas. Where we live is 1/4 of a mile from a massive state park, right on the ocean full of mountainous trails. Dude admitted he had only visited it once in 5+ years, but complained about taxes and the price of gas constantly. It’s no wonder he wanted to go back. |