▲ | og_kalu 10 days ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
>If I can choose between having a script that queries the db and generates a report and “Dave in marketing” who “has done it for years” If you could that would be nice wouldn't it? And if you couldn't? If people were saying, "let's replace Casio Calculators with interfaces to GPT" then that would be crazy and I would wholly agree with you but by and large, the processes people are scrambling to place LLMs in are ones that typical machines struggle or fail and humans excel or do decently (and that LLMs are making some headway in). You're making the wrong distinction here. It's not Dave vs your nifty script. It's Dave or nothing at all. There's no point comparing LLM performance to some hypothetical perfect understanding machine that doesn't exist. You compare to the things its meant to replace - humans. How well can the LLM do this compared to Dave ? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | kuhewa 9 days ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> by and large, the processes people are scrambling to place LLMs in are ones that typical machines struggle or fail I'm pretty sure they are scrambling to put them absolutely anywhere it might save or make a buck (or convince an investor that it could) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|