| ▲ | ygjb 2 hours ago | |||||||
I doubt it, given the importance of those subscriptions for building and maintaining market awareness. The AI landscape is changing rapidly, and with Apple announcing the option to change the AI backend, and potential requirements enable AI choices as well, similar to EU browser choice requirements (this is more reading tea leaves than any actual requirements I am aware of). The new OS changes coming to support Googlebook, and deep Copilot/AI integration into Windows will make maintaining user facing subscriptions essential for independent model developers like OpenAI, Anthropic, and Mistal to remain relevant longer term. If the don't maintain that relevance there is increasing likelihood that they will get consumed by other companies whether it's Apple, Microsoft or Google to form a foundation for their OS, or other cloud providers. | ||||||||
| ▲ | timcobb 2 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
That make sense, but what about the specific bifurcation we're seeing here of super primo models versus still good models being available to subscriptions? It's kind of annoying not getting access to the primo model and paying 200 bucks a month. I understand 200 bucks a month is basically nothing though. Like I don't totally understand why they'd let me have it for a couple weeks and then take it away and say I can have it but I have to pay retail and retail is like $1,000 a day. It's better to have loved and lost than to have never loved at all?? | ||||||||
| ||||||||