| ▲ | JumpCrisscross an hour ago | |||||||
The point is complying with the DMA from the outset could mean having to launch a year later everywhere. Skipping the EU makes sense in a fast-moving market (if you’re designated as a gatekeeper). | ||||||||
| ▲ | inetknght an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
> Skipping the EU makes sense in a fast-moving market (if you’re designated as a gatekeeper). Skipping the EU makes sense if the company doesn't want to comply with regulations aimed directly at it. > complying with the DMA from the outset could mean having to launch a year later everywhere. Oh no! Anyway... Once upon a time, companies delayed launches specifically so they'd launch a better product. That seems to be gone these days and end-users have garbage products as a result. | ||||||||
| ▲ | microtonal an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
They have already launched two years late. Remember when we all had to buy an iPhone 16 to get Apple Intelligence? Besides that, Google has shipped many (not all) similar features to Pixels in the EU and have been for years. | ||||||||
| ||||||||