> Pricing for both models is $10 per million input tokens and $50 per million output tokens.

The step-up in intelligence looks massive (we'll see in practice), but the price is getting to a point where it's making me question if it's even worth giving it a try.

Good competitors will probably be out soon, which should level the playing field. I am more excited about that, just the fact that they showed that such an improvement is possible. I'm okay waiting a bit longer for this to become attainable for plebs like me.

▲

xyzsparetimexyz 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

This is probably the end of 'use the best model no matter the price'

▲

kolinko 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The pricing can be a bit deceptive though. A good model can deliver the same results in fewer tokens.

Kind of like billing a programmer by the hour.

	▲	zyuiop 12 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Sadly this does not seem to be the case here: if you read the announcement entirely, they include a "cost per task" metric which basically continues the trend of their previous models. So yes, tasks will cost you more, but results will be better - allegedly.

▲

sourcecodeplz 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Why wouldn't it be? How much would you pay a scientist at this point to think about a problem for you and give you a solution?