> one of the world’s wealthiest companies can spare the resources needed to comply with the regulations of one of the world’s largest markets

At what cost? This is Apple’s second bite at AI. Giannandrea fucked up the first time. I’m honestly with Cupertino on not over complicating it the second time around. If they found the right mix of features and architecture, great, then work to port it to high-bar jurisdictions.

▲

disgruntledphd2 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> At what cost? This is Apple’s second bite at AI. Giannandrea fucked up the first time. I’m honestly with Cupertino on not over complicating it the second time around. If they found the right mix of features and architecture, great, then work to port it to high-bar jurisdictions.

I totally agree with you in principle here, but Apple have a pretty large vested interest in not supporting interoperability here (and in the other cases, like Mac mirroring) so I honestly don't see that happening at all.

This is purely a lobbying move against the EU to get EU citizens/politicians to complain about the laws and get an exemption.

And to be fair, Apple's business model is currently structurally incompatible with a lot of the DMA (which I personally think is a good thing), so they kinda have to fight it for a while.

▲

ahartmetz an hour ago | parent | next [-]

That lobbying move has been tried how many times? It hasn't worked once. There is no disagreement along any political lines I can think of.

It's not that we particularly like the EU government here in the EU. But we do like when they make pro-consumer laws.

▲

inetknght an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> Apple have a pretty large vested interest in not supporting interoperability here

Yeah that needs to stop. This is kinda why the DMA was created in the first place...

▲

jen20 30 minutes ago | parent [-]

It doesn't _have_ to stop - the features just can't ship in the EU while these requirements are in place, which is exactly what is happening here. The law is working as intended, just not in the way the proponents thought it would.

	▲	troupo 4 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		> the features just can't ship in the EU while these requirements are in place, Yes, they can. Apple wields its duopoly power to try and bend governments to its will.

▲

JumpCrisscross an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

> purely a lobbying move

It can be more than one thing. It’s a lobbying move, to be sure. But it’s also almost certainly a time-to-market and potentially cost-mitigation play, too.

▲

lokar an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

The cost is almost certainly in time, not staff