| ▲ | kube-system 2 hours ago |
| The exemption requested was temporary. |
|
| ▲ | microtonal 38 minutes ago | parent | next [-] |
| The 18 months was to entrench themselves in favor of other players. |
|
| ▲ | necovek 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| EU response said it was "for a minimum of 18 months" — does not sound temporary to me. |
| |
| ▲ | Johnny555 an hour ago | parent [-] | | How is that not temporary? "Ok, you asked for an exemption for a minimum of 18 months, we're granting you what you asked for, an 18 month exemption". | | |
| ▲ | microtonal 36 minutes ago | parent [-] | | By now, Apple has accrued years of malicious DMA/DSA compliance. After those 18 months they'll try to find another reason not to allow competition. Besides that, the law is the law and the DMA/DSA has been around for years. Why should they get an exception is one part of a duopoly? |
|
|
