You mean they wanted there to be no confusion whatsoever that they wouldn't allow competition in their ecosystem.

The exemption requested was temporary.

The 18 months was to entrench themselves in favor of other players.

necovek 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

EU response said it was "for a minimum of 18 months" — does not sound temporary to me.

How is that not temporary? "Ok, you asked for an exemption for a minimum of 18 months, we're granting you what you asked for, an 18 month exemption".

	▲	microtonal 38 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		By now, Apple has accrued years of malicious DMA/DSA compliance. After those 18 months they'll try to find another reason not to allow competition. Besides that, the law is the law and the DMA/DSA has been around for years. Why should they get an exception is one part of a duopoly?