Remix.run Logo
amphitheatre 4 hours ago

tl;dr: "Slow down and think about what you're doing when using an LLM." Saved you five minutes.

I was expecting a lot more, or a worked example, or _something_ to that effect. 90% of the text is the author complaining and defining the problem, then a hand-wavy vague solution is presented in the penultimate paragraph. Barely relevant or useful, really.

edgarvaldes 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Almost all opinion pieces are like that. They lack information density, but some readers (like me) like them that way. Otherwise, I'd only read one-line summaries.

Yokohiii 3 hours ago | parent [-]

I guess some people don't like articles that don't deliver a skill.md to solve a problem.

For me the article is about programmer culture and work ethics, it's hard to discuss with hard facts. Yet sharing this personal experience is valuable.

kaydub 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I mean, go look at the author's linkedin and github. They're a "dev" with 20 years of 1 year of experience. Not a software "engineer"

There's a big difference between the two and LLMs are increasing the chasm. The Software devs are crying out because the LLMs can already do their full job. Software engineers are happy because the LLMs are removing a large chunk of the job that's low value.

Software dev using an LLM is gonna produce "slop"

Software engineer using an LLM is going to have an increase in productivity depending on how they're using the LLM tools.

Yokohiii 3 hours ago | parent [-]

There is no universally accepted distinction between developer and engineer.

Even if so, dev or engineer, both can be low or high skill. Their job title doesn't tell how sloppy or good their LLM usage will be.

kaydub 2 hours ago | parent [-]

This isn't about distinction between literal titles. But continue missing the point.

Yokohiii 2 hours ago | parent [-]

You make up an false dichotomy. The differentiation between the title and the supposed skill level based on title, is neither true nor helpful to make your point.

kaydub an hour ago | parent [-]

There's no false dichotomy. You're just choosing to miss the point to argue semantics.

Yokohiii 29 minutes ago | parent [-]

Well you could make your point clear, instead you keep acting like I am hostile.