| ▲ | sharperguy 4 hours ago | |
Free speech doesn't mean that we don't desire filters. Go check your gmail spam folder. Twitter would look identical to this with filters at all. What we really want is: * transparency about the filters we have on our feeds * the ability to tweak them if they're not working * the ability to change providers without losing your entire social graph / reach | ||
| ▲ | _the_inflator 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
You are on to something but going the wrong path. It is all about personal decision making and not enforcement by goverment. To put it: " * Government decides and approves about the filters we have on our feeds * the government has the right and duty to tweak them if they're not working in the way a panel of experts decides * no ability to change providers since there is only one that takes care of your entire social graph / reach " Choose the premise wisely. | ||
| ▲ | trumpdong 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
You're not a free speech absolutist then. | ||