The US power grid is not able to keep up with demand, it's mired in red tape. There's also a populist revolt against DCs and the infra upgrade costs being dumped on ratepayers. That's the main benefit I see of their plan, from a US perspective. I think China probably will have a significantly easier time.

▲

zarzavat an hour ago | parent [-]

> The US power grid is not able to keep up with demand, it's mired in red tape

Why not build off-grid?

> There's also a populist revolt against DCs and the infra upgrade costs being dumped on ratepayers.

What about the other 94% of the Earth's landmass?

	▲	ericd an hour ago \| parent [-]
		>Why not build off-grid? He sort of is. I believe people aren't very happy with his gas turbines powering Colossus near Memphis. There's also currently a >5 year backlog for nat gas turbines for combined cycle plants. Solar takes up an enormous amount of space to get to reasonable base load, because you have to massively overpanel in order to carry it through winter. You need a large multiple of the panels you'd need in space to get to reliable baseload, plus batteries. During grey winter weeks, our home array is frequently making like 1/6 what it does during summer, and even summer days have night/weather/etc compared to sun sync orbits. Nuclear is hilariously expensive and slow to build. But I have some hope for small reactors and Commonwealth Fusion Systems/Helion. >What about the other 94% of the Earth's landmass? Geopolitical concerns, infrastructure/power availability, security, since these things are full of incredibly valuable hardware.